View Single Post
Old 19-07-2003, 22:36   #68
Escapee
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: This Planet
Posts: 4,028
Escapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze array
Escapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze arrayEscapee has a bronze array
mmm said
Quote:
An average 80,000 users
I think that number is quite a high target to achieve, when you sconsider they will have to be in an area capable of getting ntl service, not allready an ntl broadband customer, not allready happy with their ADSL, and possibly not p***ed of with either AOL or ntl through past experience.

What do other peopel think about figures meeting these conditions, and how many potential customers are out there willing to pay for this service, I would of thought the biggest percentage would allready be ntl customers if they wanted this service.

cjmillsnun said
Quote:
So AOL install their own UBRs, and the result is no overcapacity for AOL users
Would it be cost effective for AOL to install their own ubr's with a target 80000 users across x amount of ntl hubsite/ubr locations?

They must surely be going to use ntl's existing ubr's and us/ds allocations.
Escapee is offline   Reply With Quote