Quote:
|
Originally Posted by andygrif
I would agree with that, but whilst no-one may have been to 'blame' someone has to be accountable. Surely as Prime Minister the buck must stop with him. If there was any doubt whatsoever - which there was - then it was up to the PM to make a difficult decision.
Greg Dyke wasn't to blame for the 'innacuracies' of the BBC's reporting, but the buck stopped with him and he did the honourable thing (despite it being a huge loss to the Beeb), and resigned.
What annoys me today is that I had to listen to Blair saying that invading Iraq was the right thing to do anyway. I know that a lot of people think it was, but a lot of people think otherwise, and having to endure Blair trying to justify himself for the upteenth time just rubs salt into the wounds of the latter.
|
Stop using the BBC as an example nothing should have happened there. I like how biased the sun, the times and to a small extent sky news was though. SOMEONE seemed to be telling them to rub salt in the bbc wounds...
Blair has to be servered but those people and the buck should stop with the head of JIC.