View Single Post
Old 14-07-2004, 03:18   #10
punky
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Age: 45
Posts: 14,750
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
punky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aurapunky has a golden aura
Re: Why castration is NOT the answer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
Could I just point out here that, under the current state of the law on sex offences, "Indecent Assault" includes

"Causing another person to perform indecent acts without consent"

Since a child cannot, legally, consent to a sexual act, even if the boy was actually a willing participant and was not forced or injured in anyway, the act would *still* be classed as "indecent assault".

http://www.protectingthepublic.homeo...k/chapter3.htm
I was under the impression that that only applied to females. Males could still make a complaint, but charges couldn't be enforced without them?

Anyway, the legal age of culpability is 10. A 13 year old girl would know right from wrong.
punky is offline   Reply With Quote