Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cookie_365
Problem is, no computer algorithm can ever be as good at deciding what's spam & whats not. And how many false positives is acceptable? 1%? 5%? 0%? It all depends on the person, the value of the content of the messages, the chances the content is similar to spam messages blah blah blah.
|
Cookie makes a very good point - that the decision as to what is spam and what isn't has a personal element to it. So one man's spam is another man's interesting newsletter, so to speak
