12-07-2004, 21:32
|
#35
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 45
Services: SkyQ 2TB - Multiroom x3,
VM 350Mb cable broadband.
Posts: 702
|
Re: Is NAV 2004 Worth it?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Electrolyte
I used to use NAV 2004, took forever to load up and used loads of disk activity up. Got my update CD from Microsoft, included a free 1 year trial of EZ Anti-Virus and EZ Fire Wall, installed the Anti-Virus and left the fire wall, unistalled NAV 2004 and got a huge performance increase  . Even though EZ AV only uses about 2mb of my memory, it's fast as hell. Faster than NAV, and faster at scanning when requested. Updates are much smaller aswell, about 1.3mb for a virus definition update. So I wouldn't bother with NAV 2004  |
I also swear by EZ Antivirus
|
|
|