View Single Post
Old 12-07-2004, 17:08   #66
orangebird
Inactive
 
orangebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hampshire
Services: Yeah Baby! ;)
Posts: 5,684
orangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny star
orangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny star
Re: blacks and asians more prone to being stopped

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr wadd
You merely asked when, under the current legislation (as that is the only valid framework under which to address the question) stop and search would be justified. To be honest, I do not believe that the police should necessarily have the right to what essentially amounts to arbitrary stop and search powers. If the police wish to search my house they are supposed to get a search warrant, I fail to see why such protection shouldn`t extend to my pockets, bags, etc.



And in real terms, what protection does it actually offer you? Stop and searches are up by around 300%, arrests are down. Mathematically, it isn`t an effective tactic, so what protection does it offer you?
A little is better than none IMO. What else do you suggest we do?
orangebird is offline   Reply With Quote