View Single Post
Old 08-07-2004, 14:59   #58
downquark1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Age: 39
Services: Plusnet FFTC
Posts: 4,951
downquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appeal
downquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appeal
Re: Bleeding-heart liberal do-gooders

Quote:
Originally Posted by towny
I think the way the Guardian goes about offering its opinion rankles with me more than most newspapers (except perhaps the so-called Independent, which I was beginning to respect until it started to go a bit mental a month or so ago).

The Daily Mail does the moral outrage thing very well, but it doesn't use its front page to tell you what to think (except when it occasionally runs a comment on the front page, which is always clearly labelled as such) or to suggest you're heartless or pathetic if you don't think a certain way. The Guardian and the Inde, on the other hand, are very good at adopting a tone of snide moral superiority even in items that are, ostensibly, straight reporting and not editorial comment.
I have to totally disagree, daily mail articles seem to be very closed minded and aggresive. And moral outrage entirely depends on the morality or the person in question.

Plus the editor was on desert island discs - he was a jerk.
__________________
"Knowledge is Power. Power Corrupts. Study Hard. Be Evil."
downquark1 is offline   Reply With Quote