Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Neil
Hi Mark 
I am guessing that I am one of the people you are referring to (not a problem)
The difference between BT's cap & ntl's is that BT haven't tried to hide the fact. It is clearly advertised & mentioned.
ntl on the other hand, chose to slip theirs into their AUP late on a Friday night hoping that no one would notice  (I should know-it was us that broke the story) 
It comes down to honesty & professionalism, & ntl lacked both when it came to amending their AUP regarding the cap IMO.
As ever-that is not a reflection on any associates that post here, just the people at the top who make the buffoon decisions & make your jobs harder.  |
I think to be fair to Neil, his problem seems to be not so much with the cap itself but the way it was handled at the time. And I'm not going to argue with him on that point.
My question is aimed at those people who bang on and on about how bad actually having the cap is...which is fair enough and a legitimate opinion...but who seem to be remarkably silent now that similar caps are being introduced by ntl's competitors.
I don't personally like caps, but ntl's and BT's don't seem unduly restrictive, though I do wonder about how strictly BT intend to enforce theirs next year.