Thread: Comparing Web Host Providers
View Single Post
Old 22-06-2004, 10:23   #35
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: Comparing Web Host Providers
Quote:
Originally Posted by JediMaster
So I have to pay them aswell as 123REG? Or 1 of them?
No read post 24 again properly

The paying them directly £94 is one option, otherwise you can pay through a member e.g. 123REG, who will charge what they consider to be a commercial fee, along with other required fees for DNS management etc. As 123REG do the end user billing accounts receivable, deal in bulk etc, the cost nominet charge them is considerably lower than the £80 they offer to you.

Put that letter in the bin if you have paid 123REG. Think of it as a reminder if 123REG are tardy.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote