Thread: Comparing Web Host Providers
View Single Post
Old 21-06-2004, 11:35   #20
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: Comparing Web Host Providers
If someone else sharing your server runs some crap scripts or has a resource intensive site, it will have a performance impact on you site. For this reason Corporate and now CF have their own server, problem tracking means tracking down your problem, not who on the server is causing the problem. However you will be looking at paying around £100+ a month for a dedicated server, you need the revenue or compliance requirements (as Towny has mentioned) to justify that investment.

While Iweb had problems with the sparrow (the server name), it has now been put down, and a replacement taken from the datacentre.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote