May I just say if you want someone to clarify or address an issue, it is usual to ask them to do so instead of expecting them to read your mind, then critiscising them on a forum for not being able to do so.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by timewarrior2001
But if they have emmigrated thats fair enough, if they are seeking asylum from persecution in their country would it not be practical to have a condition of asylum that when safe they will be shipped back to their homeland? Is that actually wrong? I dont think it is.
If they are honest and said we want to come to the UK to work, to better our life and we are not seeking asylum then fair enough, not a need for re-patriation in my view.
|
Fair enough? My views are in plain black and white/whatever colour configuration you have setup. No one is side stepping, I dont see any harm in re-patriation of asylum seekers, once it is safe of course. I dont see any harm in letting people wanting to move here to work and better their lives in staying.
The granting of asylum is not an indefinate right to remain.
Ethnic origin does not mean Non white. It means if a frenchman wanted to go back to France they would get help.
We all know in reality that the BNP's idea of voluntary means hounded, but what I am saying is that you cant instantly dismiss the idea purely because you dont believe in the views of the BNP. I have alos been trying to point out that the views of the "anti" brigaed, the Anti Nazi league , anti BNP, whatever, are just as bad, they are denying people the right to a democracy, the right to freedom of speech (even if in the UK freedom of speech isnt a right, its a priviledge).
I do NOT support the BNP and I am as much against the ANL as I am against the BNP.