View Single Post
Old 25-05-2004, 18:15   #68
greencreeper
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Leeds - the dog house
Age: 48
Services: Email me for a current price list
Posts: 8,270
greencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny star
greencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny stargreencreeper has a nice shiny star
Re: [merged] NTL Spam Filtering

Quote:
Originally Posted by sherer
i've recently been getting spam mails labelled as SEXUALLY EXPLICIT as per this acticle

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/04...rn_spam_label/

now my thinking is that if these mails are conforming to the FTC rules then they should also be conforming to the CAN-SPAM rules of the US and I can then use the remove me link ok to get off the list. Anyone else got any mails like this yet and tried the remove link..

trouble is these days if you use a remove link how do you know if it has really worked or not with the amount of spam we get!! they can easily mail back to say you have removed and then send you 10 mails from different companies all spoofed without you realising..
You wouldn't get me clicking a remove link for all the tea in china - it's pretty much guaranteed to make things worse regardless of guidelines/laws/regulations.
greencreeper is offline   Reply With Quote