Thread: Babylon 5
View Single Post
Old 21-05-2004, 21:34   #15
ZrByte
Inactive
 
ZrByte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Wirral / Ex CWC Area
Age: 43
Posts: 3,251
ZrByte has a bronzed appealZrByte has a bronzed appeal
ZrByte has a bronzed appealZrByte has a bronzed appealZrByte has a bronzed appealZrByte has a bronzed appealZrByte has a bronzed appealZrByte has a bronzed appeal
Send a message via MSN to ZrByte
Re: Star Trek : Enterprise

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tezcatlipoca
Just because Excalibur flopped, doesn't mean that the original B5 was crap or a failure.

B5 was a very well made series, with a well-done over-arching story (JMS even had a "bible" for it, rather than just make it up as he went along).

But, anyway. B5 & the various Trek series each had their own plus & minus points. I like both Trek & B5, for different reasons.
I could have sworn it was called cruisades (spelling??) not Excalibur, wasnt Excalibur the name of the ship?

Ive got a background book about babylon 5, quite fun to read, its interesting reading about first contact between Earth & Naans and what happened to the first three stations (I know it tells you what happened during the series but this goes into a bit more detail)
ZrByte is offline   Reply With Quote