Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tezcatlipoca
Not all of them!  
Oh, & don't forget the crap email servers, the crap news servers, the crap proxies, the....
But yeah, the service isn't too bad  (if you're lucky)
My results from just now (1Mb service, Cambridge)
RDHW's speed test:
1st 128K took 1078 ms = 121588 Bytes/sec = approx 1012 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1063 ms = 123304 Bytes/sec = approx 1026 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1047 ms = 125188 Bytes/sec = approx 1042 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1078 ms = 121588 Bytes/sec = approx 1012 kbits/sec
Dan Elwell's speed test:
(from http://www.broadbandspeedtest.net/) |
Ok here's mine:
Wed, 19 May 2004 00:42:39 UTC
1st 128K took 1062 ms = 123420 Bytes/sec = approx 1027 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1063 ms = 123304 Bytes/sec = approx 1026 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1062 ms = 123420 Bytes/sec = approx 1027 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1078 ms = 121588 Bytes/sec = approx 1012 kbits/sec
Section 3: Download Speed Results
Three downloads are tested; one from one of your ISPs servers, one through your Transparent Cache and one through an alterntive cache. This will give you an idea of how capable your connection is. Note: You should take the highest download speed into account.
ntl:World - 1Mb service Server Download:
119KB/s (952Kb/s) - Perfect - running at full speed!
Download through Transparent Cache:
120KB/s (960Kb/s) - Perfect - running at full speed!
Download through alternative Cache (webcache.verynaughty.co.uk):
999KB/s (1 million Kb/s) - Blimey thats a bit swift you will have ntl on yer case
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~