Thread: Software version numbering -- a proposition
View Single Post
Old 19-05-2004, 00:59   #11
Tristan
Inactive
 
Tristan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Glastonbury!
Services: Telewest DTV & 4Meg BB (Bath), NTL DTV and 2Meg BB (Poole)
Posts: 1,350
Tristan has reached the bronze age
Tristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze ageTristan has reached the bronze age
Re: Software version numbering -- a proposition
I did wonder what the official NTL version numbering system was, but I figured that if I didn't know, most other forum members probably didn't either

So would you recommend that the Langley software currently rolling out be called L3.1 instead? You're the expert on here when it comes to the STB software, so we'll go with what you suggest.

Oh, and I don't know how much you can say, but I'm very curious about the fact that "3.2 Langley" and "3.2 Bromley", "are not functionally equivalent"... could you explain further?

Thanks
Tristan is offline   Reply With Quote