View Single Post
Old 17-05-2004, 10:16   #11
andygrif
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,820
andygrif has a bronze arrayandygrif has a bronze arrayandygrif has a bronze array
andygrif has a bronze arrayandygrif has a bronze arrayandygrif has a bronze arrayandygrif has a bronze arrayandygrif has a bronze arrayandygrif has a bronze arrayandygrif has a bronze array
Re: Itemised phone billing

Frankly I think it is a disgrace that any company in 2004 can seriously expect customer to pay for a statement of account. I do understand the reasons for, I don't acept that it costs anywhere like £1 (more like a few pence depending on how many sheets) - but can you imagine if your bank started charging you for your monthly statements on all transactions under £20?

I doesn't really affect me as I get free itemised from ntl anyway (carefully negotiated using the above as my argument!) It's not the £1, it's principle that a company can effectively not tell you what you've used without charging extra.
andygrif is offline   Reply With Quote