Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ramrod
....and the people who carried out an abortion on an underage girl without her mothers knowledge or consent.
|
I fail entirely to see why the girl's mother should have to provide consent for this abortion. It's not the mother who is going to have carry the baby around for 9 months, it's not the mother who is going to be stuck with the kid after it is born (yes, I know the mother may assist, but ultimately the responsibility is going to be on the girl involved).
What if the mother were pro-life whereas the girl was pro-choice? Do you really think that it is fair for the mother to be able to veto the girl's decision when it is the girl who is going to be the one primarily affected?