View Single Post
Old 11-05-2004, 01:19   #59
ian@huth
Inactive
 
ian@huth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Huthwaite, Nottinghamshire
Services: VM 10Mb, TU, 1xSky HD, 2xSky+ (HD,all packs, sports & movies) 2xDVD PVR's, Freesat Freeview & other
Posts: 4,536
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
Re: Why ntl and not sky?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdean
Leemarsh - my comment re freeview- ntl sky fta sat etc was about:-
1)picture quality- not numbers of channel ie on the same tv there is no difference between the different platforms (contary to some daft posts here.

2) A VCR / PVR/Pc can record off any of these sources- Sky+ can only record off sky

Therefore sky + is propriatory rubbish to be avoided at all costs.

Clearly to tape 2 ntl sources you need 2 ntl boxes and 2 recorders
mdean, have you ever had Sky+ in your home and used it for a while in order to judge its performance and features?

There is a difference in quality between the various platforms and my experience is that NTL is the worst of them, particularly in hot weather. Others may have different experiences with the various systems but having tried them all I know which I prefer.

If you want decent quality recordings then Sky+ gives you recordings of the same quality as the original transmissions. Do your solutions do this? VCR recordings are of a much lower quality than Sky+ recordings but if you are satisfied with less than the best take that route.

Sky+ may only be usable on Sky but as Sky is the best platform (in my opinion) the that is no problem.
ian@huth is offline   Reply With Quote