Quote:
|
Originally Posted by andygrif
I guess this was an attempt to try to keep her inside for as long as possible, more than likely for her own protection.
Even if she is given anonymity and a secret location, without constant police protection I cannot see her being safe anywhere in this country - as her face is now so recognisable.
I would think that it is far cheaper to keep her inside than offer police protection - although it looks like this has failed and she will be released according to the law.
I think it is still very unclear, although the courts have decided, how involved she was in the murder of those two little girls - and as such the vast majority of people still think she was involved in their killing.
|
I think it is very clear indeed that she was not at all involved in the killing. Her conviction centres on the fact that she claimed she was in town to give Huntley and alibi when in fact she was away in Grimsby. If she was proven to be many miles away, and was found guilty of perverting the cause of justice for that reason, what could possibly still be unclear?
The jury decided what she was guilty of, and it is a sacred legal principal that a properly informed and guided jury cannot be wrong.
Maxine Carr is guilty of extreme stupidity. She did not kill anyone, she did not plan to kill anyone and she was not an accessory to killing anyone. She will shortly have done her time and has the same right as anyone else in this country to try to put it behind her and get on with her life.