Thread: 14:9 option?
View Single Post
Old 08-05-2004, 00:03   #7
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: 14:9 option?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gary_580
huh? when i had a 4:3 i know for a fact that stuff was being chopped of the side if the transmission was in widescreen. Who looks fat and stretched? get a decent widescreen and the stretching is done towards the edges so that its not so noticeable.
My 28" 4:3 toshiba was perfect.
Massive 4:3 image, and a big 16:9 image too.
Parents have got a Panasonic widescreen.
Total waste of £600
Fine if you're watching a widescreen transmission (although its only a 32" screen so the image isn't that big anyway)

The latest pain in the backside fad is widescreen laptops, they look bloody awful.
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote