Thread: 14:9 option?
View Single Post
Old 07-05-2004, 21:23   #4
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: 14:9 option?

See, this is why I wouldn't waste my money on a widescreen TV when I can get a much larger 4:3 TV for the same money or less.
You get a large 16:9 image when in widescreen mode, and an even larger full screen image for the rest.
With widescreen you get a smaller widescreen image (cos of the cost) and a minescule 4:3 image, unless you like seeing every looking fat and stretched.
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote