Thread: Why ntl and not sky?
View Single Post
Old 06-05-2004, 09:25   #49
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: Why ntl and not sky?
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemarsh
It's late, and I'm feeling generous!!
Although I'm seriously thingking of moving to Sky+, I'm certainly leaving the BB with NTL, it works well around Hertford enough of the time (all networks have some problems) and the 750k will be a nice bonus. Better still would be 256 the other way, but with the resdesign of the website uploads will be lighter and fewer as it will be mainly modifying the product database.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote