Thread: Why ntl and not sky?
View Single Post
Old 05-05-2004, 13:38   #24
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: Why ntl and not sky?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdean
Why would i want dual record ? Better not to be locked into propriatory technology (esp when owned by Rupe)
But you can always rip the HDD out of the box when you are done with it. At £200 its pretty subsidised. A standalone PVR is £400+, and its another box under your TV.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote