View Single Post
Old 04-05-2004, 15:57   #48
etccarmageddon
Inactive
 
etccarmageddon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 5,638
etccarmageddon has a nice shiny star
etccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny staretccarmageddon has a nice shiny star
Re: NTL worse than BT

Quote:
Originally Posted by ackees
Unfortunately many people have swallowed the †˜switch providerââ‚à ƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚¢ trap hook line and sinker. Switching waste time and money and causes distress to honest customers. The telecoms providers have massaged this well and play cleaver games with it.
It is a bit like saying if you do not like the bread prices in London got to Scotland to get your bread, and if the price jumps up there run back to London for your bread, nuts.
The service provider in each area must be made to supply services at a certain standard and they must be forced to maintained reasonable prices and their price increases must be reasonable. A 25% price rise after a 100% price rise is not reasonable.
it's called 'shopping around' - if you're not willing to do it and suffer the 'distress' (lmao) of having to switch to a better supplier then that's your problem.
etccarmageddon is offline