View Single Post
Old 03-05-2004, 15:38   #114
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: MERGED - Prisoner Abuse

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
Xaccers, do *YOU* have any *PROOF* of these accusations? That the Mirror really would "rather have kept Saddam in power"? That they deliberately published them "to damage the work we are doing to rebuild Iraq and relations in the middle east"?
How about the editor stating on TV that we were wrong to go to war to oust saddam? That he believed we should not have ousted the leader of another country? That his paper would do all that it could to prove our government shouldn't have done it?
And do you honestly believe that when they were given these images, the damage publishing them would do never crossed their minds? They could have reported that they had been passed images but had done the sensible thing in giving them to the army to investigate.
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote