[punky]

I saw a bit on TV about it earlier, and it suprised me how little I realised about the pics (susceptible maybe?). I mean, the TV report pointed out how there was no dirt anywhere. No sweat. No body marks at all. Not one bruise, laceration, nothing. How I never saw that myself looking at the photos before, I don't know, but after it was pointed it out, I can't believe I ever thought the pictures might be real.

Incidently, I don't think the Mirror faked the pictures, although saying that, if an anti-war group faked them (which I think they did), but i'm suprised the group didn't give them to the Guardian, to give the pictures a bit more credibility. Or maybe they did, and turned them down, not believing they were true?