Quote:
|
Originally Posted by towny
Except, of course, that so far you have completely failed to prove:
1. That discrimination is always wrong
2. That the language of the question is inflammatory
3a. That it is not possible for two sections of societies issues both to be significant at the same time, but one be judged more significant than the other and
3b. Choosing one over the other does not make the other 'insignificant'.
Other than that, good post.  |
I dont have to prove anything. Its discrimination. I think discrimination is wrong. Whatever the circumstances.
The languege is inflammatory as it's attacking gays and not the people who are either being discriminatory or those who hold prejudicial ideas about men and earrings. Yes! Even with a question mark at the end.
Let those who are prejudiced defend their ideas. What is it about policemen (as opposed to policewomen) wearing earrings, that means they deserve less respect than a policeman without earrings but a policewoman with earrings???