Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Graham
Yes, I'm aware of that, however the implication was seemingly that I would agree with you that it was a circular argument.
And, as you said, "Perish the thought that I should assume your support for anything."
|
Far be it from me to put words in your mouth. I did say
might have, and my whole reason for mentioning your name at all was by way of acknowledging that I was using source material that you originally introduced to the forum.
Additionally, you did not make clear earlier that you had drawn a distinction in my post between discussion of a logical fallacy and direct discussion of the topic subject.
So, is it a circular argument then?