Quote:
|
Originally Posted by towny
Right, now we're getting somewhere. Previously you have claimed that this is 'an issue'. Now you say it is 'an issue for me'. The dress code rules were not framed to address your issues. They were written for a section of society that still has problems with its perception of men wearing ear rings. My contention - and presumably that of those people who wrote the rules - is that the right of men to wear ear rings is secondary to the needs of those in the community who have a problem with men wearing ear rings.
|
Yeah, keep twisting my words till they say what you wanna say. 'An issue for me' is in relation to this thread and discussion forum. It is both 'an issue' and 'an issue for me'.
I dont care who the rules are written for, they are discriminatory. If you dont understaind how they are discriminatory then look up the word.
I've made my point plain and simple. if women can wear earrings then so should men, any law that says otherwise is discrimination.
As to the phrasing of the thread. Again its predudicial to gays, not only do they have to fight for the right to wear earrings, but they also have to face being labled as trouble makers and 'screaming queens' before they can actually get to the problem at hand.
'Police discriminate' is much more fair and still offers a provocative title but like I said before Im not predudiced against gays but I am against the police so my choice of wording would be like that.
Stop trying to score points and actually give a reason why you think its ok to discriminate against a section of society?