Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Incognitas
I just didn't understand the first sentence of your original posting to Russ.I asked you about it and you got on YOUR high horse and accused me of being biased because I didn't understand.You then accused me of bias because I disagreed about all police being allowed to wear whatever jewellery they want in duty.Then you changed the subject after I pointed out that I have to conform to a dress code for my job,to a tirade against the wearing of ties by men and not women.I thought we were having a discussion by the way.
THEN Pem said he didn't understand that sentence either so I spoke up because I was still confused about what your meaning was.
So to sum up I am biased because one of your sentences was gramatically confusing and I'm supposed to telepathically understand what you meant.
I'm just biased against non communication really.
|
What's my 'high horse' gotta do with anything? Again thats your perception of my post. No horses getting high here.
No your not biased because my sentance was 'gramatically confusing'. Your biased because your on the opposite side of the argument, just as im biased the other way.
Definition of the word
'biased'
'Favoring one attribute or characteristic more than another'
Its not a judgement just a statement of fact.