View Single Post
Old 26-04-2004, 20:10   #24
Chris W
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Reading
Age: 42
Services: Virgin Media Broadband Size M
Posts: 6,546
Chris W has a nice shiny star
Chris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny starChris W has a nice shiny star
Send a message via MSN to Chris W
Re: Image protection

Quote:
Originally Posted by Incognitas
Thank you.

So if one spent a long time over the dicing method you could deter all but the most dedicated?

Though I guess screengrab would work but would the resulting images be much good?

Incog.
personally, i think all of the methods mentioned will deter all except the most dedicated, so it is upto you which you want to use. Watermarking will mess up your images, but on the other hand, dicing will take a long time to do.

IMO disabling the right click is the best option, because you just have to copy the javascript from somewhere are paste it into the source code. If you use something like Dreamweaver then you can make a template which has the script and any other standard features of each page in automatically.

as for the quality of the screenshot... attached is one that i took while i was typing this, cropped to focus on the smilies section.... saved as a bmp, but the quality is still reasonable.

MB
Chris W is offline   Reply With Quote