View Single Post
Old 16-04-2004, 02:51   #46
erol
Inactive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: cyprus
Posts: 510
erol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to all
Re: Jail for non-compliant women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers
But the person gets the same housing benifit if childless. It's not because they have a child.
Not sure about that. Someone on housing benefit with 6 kids must get more than a lone adult surely?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers
There's a max amount, which is why Chris Evans despite having millions pays less than 6000 a year for his daughter.
OK I was not aware of such a cap (or that Chris Evans had a child ). I see what you are saying and kinda agree with it but it's not quite a simple as it seems. For a start a lone adult with a child, that needs it, will get more benefit than a lone adult without a child. So certainly it seems fair to me that such benefits (the extra for the child) should be 'discounted' against the child support payment from the absent parent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Debsy42
Kids are treated as bargaining tools and it's about time this was stopped.
I think everyone would agree with this but I guess the real question is how do you stop acrimonious parents using the kids in such a way?
erol is offline   Reply With Quote