View Single Post
Old 16-04-2004, 01:59   #38
erol
Inactive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: cyprus
Posts: 510
erol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to all
Re: Jail for non-compliant women

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers
Now I see

It's stupid, the payments made are supposed to be for the benifit of the child, therefore it's the child's income, not the custody holders.
If someone isn't on benifit, then their child gets more.
If the state is paying someone benefits to support a child and they subsequently get the missing partner to pay support for the child, then it seems right to me that they either stop the benefits or carry on the benefits and take the child support? Or have I missed something here?
erol is offline   Reply With Quote