Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Incognitas
But if the woman was on 30K why did she get the CSA on her case?Why would she be claiming benefits?I'm not having a go I just want to understand why the CSA were involved.
|
The woman on 30k isn't on benifits, that was a totally seperate situation.
The 30K woman (lets call her Carol) is a messed up woman, she's always wanted (lets call him Dave) since she was a pupil of his.
She saw his wife as having the life she wanted and used their daughter as a weapon against Dave. Dave at the time was claiming he'd had the affair for 3 years, not 11.
He did something to upset Carol, so she contacted the CSA hoping they would increase the £500 a month he was already paying her (private agreement), CSA contacted Dave's wife (my friend) and wanted to take her income into account so that if she was earning a lot, Dave would have to pay more. Thankfully the CSA deemed £400 was the amount he should pay, so it backfired on Carol.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by incog
Yes I agree about the wife but you know this is what happens to second wives.Their income is included in the decision of how much a husband has to pay in alimony to a first wife and children.
Incog.
Ah! Defiant got there before me.  |
I feel that it shouldn't be like that.
Why should you pay for another couple's kids?