Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kRAyZZed
Read the hostile nature of his posts and you will see that is it not unwarranted, and please do not tell me what i can and cannot post, i merely asked a question and made the observation, seeing as his main arguement was i was paying more for sky digital than i was for ntl - (load of rubbish)
well i pay less than that for my line rental with BT, still adds up to less - and you get all the shopping ****e with NTL too, but you do genuinely get some better channels with sky, but its impossible to please everybody with channel content so surely providing a wider choice and variety is the better option? ie sky.
and to end on the same format as that other rather obnoxious individiual who cannot see any other points of view -mdean
SKY WINS!
|
Maybe sky wins for you but not everyone.
I cannot have a dish as my landlord won't allow it. I don't want to move atm, and can't get freeview. As The property was already cabled, NTL was my only option.
Also on the subject of line rental.
http://www.bt.com/lines/lo_account_d...K&obsOID=83006
BT standard line rental £9.50 / month .....seems vaguely similar to this
http://www.ntlhome.com/ntl_telephone/freeRange.html NTL 3,2,1 standard line rental £9.50 / month.
Looks like NTL is similar value for money as BT & sky. Remember NTL is cheaper but less channels. BT & sky cost slightly more but gives a slightly wider choice...... Swings & roundabouts IMHO