Quote:
|
Originally Posted by etccarmageddon
but if the man was a member of a terrorist group then surely he should have been arrested and put on trial - rather than killed via a state authorised assasination?
was he given the option to surrender?
|
There is nothing wrong with a state authorized assassination. Had he been an Israeli citizen it might be different. But, Israel has no jurisdiction in that area so laws don't apply there. A state authorized assassination was warrented.
Explain to me how preserving his life would have been beneficial to society.