View Single Post
Old 25-03-2004, 19:19   #32
erol
Inactive
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: cyprus
Posts: 510
erol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to allerol is a name known to all
Re: Should there be a right of unlimited defence of your property?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerrek
And He said to them, "When I sent you without money bag, knapsack, and sandals, did you lack anything?" So they said, "Nothing." Then He said to them, "But now, he who has a money bag, let him take it, and likewise a knapsack; and he who has no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one. For I say to you that this which is written must still be accomplished in Me: 'And He was numbered with the transgressors.' For the things concerning Me have an end." So they said, "Lord, look, here are two swords." And He said to them, "It is enough." -Luke 22:35-38
Is that supposed to be your example of

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerrek
Jesus quite clearly commanded us to take up the sword.
cause if it is - it is certainly not a clear commandment to take up the sword, as far as I can see.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerrek
Jesus would be a liberal? Are you nuts? You think He would advocate gay marriages? You think He would advocate murdering innocent babies? You think He would advocate drug use that sends your mind on a trip, open to outside demonic influences? You think He would destroy things at "peace" rallies? You think He will be rooting for Saddam Hussein and Palestinians?

Get real.
Well our views on Jesus are very different I guess. I understood that he believed in the forgiveness of sins and sinners (and not the blowing away of sinners). Do you really think Jesus's respose to finding a theif in his house stealing his sandals would be to 'blow them away'? Personaly I find it easier to imagine him offering the robbers his cloak as well as his sandals.
erol is offline   Reply With Quote