View Single Post
Old 25-03-2004, 00:22   #2
ian@huth
Inactive
 
ian@huth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Huthwaite, Nottinghamshire
Services: VM 10Mb, TU, 1xSky HD, 2xSky+ (HD,all packs, sports & movies) 2xDVD PVR's, Freesat Freeview & other
Posts: 4,536
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
ian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronzeian@huth is cast in bronze
Re: Should there be a right of unlimited defence of your property?

You should be allowed to defend your property in any way you like. If an intruder gets killed in the process then tough luck, he / she shouldn't have been there in the first place.

Just look at it from an international point of view. An Iraqi, Saddam Hussain, is thought to have weapons of mass destruction that could possibly be used against other countries. He is in his own country but the Americans and British want to go after him and if they can't capture him then kill him. They think that they have the right to do so. They do not go in with the attitude that they must only use a little force in case they injure someone. No, it's bombs and missiles galore and if they happen to kill some innocent person then so be it.

If you are in your own home and you find an armed intruder do you think I will just give him a little tap so that I don't hurt him? I wouldn't, I would make sure that he was the one to suffer and not me or my family.
ian@huth is offline   Reply With Quote