View Single Post
Old 24-03-2004, 13:59   #119
Pierre
cf.mega poster
 
Pierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 13,347
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Re: another abuser caught

Quote:
Nonsense.

Short of locking *everyone* up for life, there is *no way* to prevent *everyone* from re-offending, be they child molesters, rapists, murderers or anything else.

If *any* of them re-offend, are we *also* guilty of negligence?
But I also believe that Rapists should also get much tougher sentences. I wouldn't mind them getting life either.Rape is a horrible crime, I in 5 rapists get a jail term of less than 5 years. If you commit murder you'll likely go to jail for life anyway.

I am also in favour of tougher sentences for Drink Drivers. A drunk or dangerous driver that kills someone can only be charged with a "motoring offence" - Unbelievable. They don't even get manslaughter, I am in agreement with you there. If you want to start a thread on that subject please do so but that is not what we're talking about.

and that does not detract from my feelings on this subject
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
Pierre is offline   Reply With Quote