Quote:
|
Originally Posted by orangebird
Neil, the way you're behaving recently, I wouldn't be surprised if you secretly blamed ntl for 9/11, the plague and the Apollo 13's failed mission.
ntl did not forsee outsourcing depts, so how could they write that kind of clause in in the first place? How can ntl write a clause stating that any company that may in the future take over operations on an outsource basis should provide the associates with the same perks as ntl provide?? Especially without the companies that they're being outsourced to agreeing (because ntl didn't know at the time)???? Impossible to protect what you can't forsee Neil, I think you're being entirely unreasonable.. 
You want a crusade that's worth while, how about you lobby Fujitsu to provide all the associates in question with digi tv.... |
You are totally missing the point in your mission to vindicate ntl (for a change
)
I will say it again.......
If ntl had documented it properly in the first place (nothing to do with seeing into the future, it's about doint things properly), then the associates who are transferring to Fujitsu would not be losing their free TV/phone.
It really is very simple-the reason that the TUPE folks will lose out is because of ntl's inability to document their staff's benefits in a proper fashion.
Comprendez?
