Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Neil
YES
Jesus H Chr1st-how hard can it really be to understand? 
In my view ntl have caused these employees who are transferring to Fujitsu to be out of pocket-& that is exactly what TUPE is there to protect, but it can't protect what ntl has not documented.
*Sigh*
|
Neil, the way you're behaving recently, I wouldn't be surprised if you secretly blamed ntl for 9/11, the plague and the Apollo 13's failed mission.
ntl did not forsee outsourcing depts, so how could they write that kind of clause in in the first place? How can ntl write a clause stating that any company that may in the future take over operations on an outsource basis should provide the associates with the same perks as ntl provide?? Especially without the companies that they're being outsourced to agreeing (because ntl didn't know at the time)???? Impossible to protect what you can't forsee Neil, I think you're being entirely unreasonable..
You want a crusade that's worth while, how about you lobby Fujitsu to provide all the associates in question with digi tv....