[Pierre]

In which case, I suggest you go back and take another look at post #113

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/s...4&postcount=113

Where I said:

"I have the right to object to a course or policy *without* needing to solve the problem as the price of that objection."

It seems you did not read carefully enough.

??????? Me not read it carefully??????????

I'll explain again for the hard of thinking. In my post about 3 or previous I said.

Quote:
I have the right to object to a course or policy *without* needing to solve the problem as the price of that objection.


Another one of your quotes, which sums up the way you responded to most things on in this thread. You object and belittle a lot of posts and yet come up with nothing yourself.

That was my point you are arguing without coming up with a solution yourself, anyone can "object" but if you just "object" without offering a differing alternative to the point placed in front of you, you are not really engaging in an intelligent discussion are you.

I say again my quote from the earlier post:

1st person †œI think we should go after Al-Qaeda and use our military/intelligence to intercept them before they launch an attack on the UK mainlandââ‚à ƒâ€šÃ‚¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ÂÂ�

2nd person †œ I donââ‚Âà ‚¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚¢t think we shouldââ‚Ã⠀šÃ‚¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ÂÂ�

1st Person †œOK, what do you think we should doâ₠¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â�

2nd Person †œI donââ‚Âà ‚¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚¢t have to have a different solution to object to your ideaââ‚ ¬Ã‚ÂÂÂ�

1st Person †œGood point, letââ‚Âà ‚¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚¢s go for a pint and forget aboutââ‚ƚ¬Ã‚ÂÂÂ�

And finally

If you cannot *see* or learn(!) the difference between my raising points to counter yours

When will you learn that:

I have the right to object to a course or policy *without* needing to solve the problem

is not really a counter point is it.

I don't about you being tired of this, I certainly am.