Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pierre
Not in this thread, I was careful to read through your posts to ensure that.
|
In which case, I suggest you go back and take another look at post #113
http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/sh...&postcount=113
Where I said:
"I have the right to object to a course or policy *without* needing to solve the problem as the price of that objection."
It seems you did not read carefully enough.
Quote:
|
I am not accusing you of cowardice, I'm sorry if that is how you perceive it. I am accusing you of contradicting posts without the good grace of backing them up yourself with your own alternative solutions.
|
No, you did not. You said (again I quote your exact words):
"you have rubbished most peoples attempts at providing a solution to the problem but not been brave enough to supply your own."
Now I don't know about you, but where *I* come from, saying someone is "not brave enough" to do something does *not* equate with "good grace", but, rather, has the implication of "cowardice"!
Quote:
|
You are not having a reasoned debate. You ask me to learn. I should advise you learn the differnence between debate/argument and contradiction
|
Sigh, Pierre, I really don't know if I can be bothered to waste more time with this. If you cannot *see* or learn(!) the difference between my raising points to counter yours and someone just "yes it is! No it isn't" then I really consider there being little purpose in carrying on.