Whilst you have posted many replies on this thread you have rubbished most peoples attempts at providing a solution to the problem but not been brave enough to supply your own.
a quote from one of your first posts
Quote:
|
Just because I may disagree with a policy does *NOT* mean that I wish us to use a policy of Appeasement. I do not believe we should give in to the terrorists, but *neither* do I believe that there is only *one* solution to the problem.
|
If you believe there is more than one solution then provide it as you have only provided one up until now. Which is the †œlet Islamic states sort it themselvesââ ¬Â stance.
Quote:
|
I have the right to object to a course or policy *without* needing to solve the problem as the price of that objection.
|
Another one of your quotes, which sums up the way you responded to most things on in this thread. You object and belittle a lot of posts and yet come up with nothing yourself.
Anyone can make objections etc, but if they constantly do this without being willing to go out on a limb and give their ideas Iâ₠™m afraid their argument then holds much less stock.
Is it because if you were to give your ideas/solutions you are afraid that other people will be able to make baseless objections to your ideas?
It is a good a good job the people we have running the country are able to give differing opinions backed up with differing ideas. Can you imagine a debate in the House of Commons based on your strategy.
1st person †œI think we should go after Al-Qaeda and use our military/intelligence to intercept them before they launch an attack on the UK mainlandââ‚ ‚¬Ã‚ÂÂ
2nd person †œ I donââ‚ ¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚¢t think we shouldÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šà ¬Ã‚ÂÂ
1st Person †œOK, what do you think we should doâ₠¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â
2nd Person †œI donââ‚ ¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚¢t have to have a different solution to object to your ideaââ‚ ¬Ã‚ÂÂ
1st Person †œGood point, letââ‚ ¬ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚¢s go for a pint and forget aboutÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šà ¬Ã‚ÂÂ