Quote:
|
Originally Posted by poolking
Check Robin Walker's site with a list of proxies, I don't think they're inkitomis.
|
The VIA header below shows Traffic Server which is Inktomi.
Robin's page also lists it as Inkt.
D:\temp\wgettmp>wget -S
http://www.ntlworld.com
--18:49:07--
http://www.ntlworld.com/
=> `index.html.18'
Resolving
www.ntlworld.com... 62.253.162.30
Connecting to
www.ntlworld.com[62.253.162.30]:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response...
1 HTTP/1.0 200 OK
2 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:49:07 GMT
3 Server: Apache/1.3.27 (Unix) PHP/4.3.1
4 X-Powered-By: PHP/4.3.1
5 Set-Cookie: NTLWORLD_USER=20040318184908622553262088; expires=Sat, 17-Apr-200
4 18:49:08 GMT
6 Content-Type: text/html
7 Age: 2
8 Connection: close
9 Via: HTTP/1.1 ntl-site (Traffic-Server/5.2.2-59134 [cMsSf ])
[ <=> ] 27,127 109.92K/s
18:49:09 (109.92 KB/s) - `index.html.18' saved [27127]
If I specify cache1-brhm.server.ntli.net or cache3 directly, perf is still poor.
However cache2 appears to be working fine.