View Single Post
Old 14-03-2004, 00:05   #4
Nikko
Inactive
 
Nikko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 70
Posts: 1,382
Nikko has a bronzed appealNikko has a bronzed appeal
Nikko has a bronzed appealNikko has a bronzed appealNikko has a bronzed appealNikko has a bronzed appealNikko has a bronzed appealNikko has a bronzed appealNikko has a bronzed appealNikko has a bronzed appealNikko has a bronzed appealNikko has a bronzed appealNikko has a bronzed appealNikko has a bronzed appealNikko has a bronzed appealNikko has a bronzed appealNikko has a bronzed appealNikko has a bronzed appealNikko has a bronzed appeal
Re: TU24 - BT cheaper (with call charges)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank
Sorry, but that's how I understand it. It says that ntl's standard monthly package is cheaper by £3.50, but when you start making calls over 60mins that is no longer the case, i.e. BT is cheaper. That's exactly what my thread title says - with call charges BT is cheaper, hence the ruling.
I think you have understood it correctly. In the majority of instances ntl are cheaper for chargeable calls - its a very in depth set of charges by both providers.

I think the ruling is clarifying that for certain chargeable call patterns ntl do not have the advantage, thus a sweeping statement could be construed as inaccurate.

Most folk that subscribe to the 'unlimited/inclusive' plans are astute enough to avoid chargeable calls anyway - in which case an ntl subscriber has £3.50 per month to offset any very short duration calls that overstep the 60 minutes free time.
Nikko is offline   Reply With Quote