Thread: HD Deep clean?
View Single Post
Old 10-03-2004, 11:28   #45
SMHarman
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Services: Cablevision
Posts: 8,305
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
SMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronzeSMHarman is cast in bronze
Re: HD Deep clean?
Quote:
Originally Posted by stuartbe
Cant see the point in that myself
What would you recommend then? 0+1 has a 50% greater overhead, mirroring a 0 requires another pair of HDDs.

Or would you recommned I just get another 160Gb HDD and use that for more data and backup, leaving the current R0 as is, sounds a lot easier.

I probably have about 70Gb of files on the PC that need backing up as they are not stored elswehere or would be annoying to recreate (in the case of the iTunes MyMusic folder). Video is stored on the original tapes and edited footage is also streamed back to tape as the space is cheap.

Pity camcorders won't allow you to send data to a tape. Would be a great backup device.
SMHarman is offline   Reply With Quote