Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nikko
But if thats the argument, does it not render the whole thread rather pointless?
|
No that's my argument not the thread starters one.
'My argument is that if gays are in a minority. Then how are they expected to get a fair representation if the only way they can get their own channel is by becoming rich enough to pay for one. Being a minority would mean they would have to raise more money per person than a hetero person would have to.'
The other reason I think that gays need a channel for their own, is because of the discrimination that has been going on for too many years and can only be redressed by a little saturation from the other side.