Thread: Windows Server 2000 vs 2003
View Single Post
Old 08-03-2004, 08:56   #1
Caspar
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 4,988
Caspar has reached the bronze age
Caspar has reached the bronze ageCaspar has reached the bronze ageCaspar has reached the bronze ageCaspar has reached the bronze ageCaspar has reached the bronze ageCaspar has reached the bronze ageCaspar has reached the bronze ageCaspar has reached the bronze ageCaspar has reached the bronze ageCaspar has reached the bronze ageCaspar has reached the bronze ageCaspar has reached the bronze ageCaspar has reached the bronze ageCaspar has reached the bronze ageCaspar has reached the bronze ageCaspar has reached the bronze ageCaspar has reached the bronze ageCaspar has reached the bronze age
Question Windows Server 2000 vs 2003
Right, I'm about to buy some decent dedicated server hosting, and wanted your guys' thoughts on Windows Server 2003.
  • Is it worth sourcing it over 2000?
  • What can I do on it that I can't on 2000?
  • I assume stability is improved, but I didn't have much of a problem with my old 2000 Ad server box.

I'm buying a 2.67GHz Xeon with a 1GB of RAM and 50GB harddisk, that I enough I presume!?

I'll be running SQL 2000 Server, running a web server and email... and a remote storage facility (not done before.).

Just looking for some general thoughts and any specific advice you have?
Caspar is offline   Reply With Quote