View Single Post
Old 28-02-2004, 13:56   #29
danielf
cf.mega poser
 
danielf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
Re: Pumped full of drugs :(

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nor
Of course its dangerous, thats why they are testing it surely, cos they don't know fully what effects it has on humans. Theres danger and then there is danger though and I'd imagine the risks aren't that great as they've no doubt tested it thoroughly previously before moving onto human testing.

Its naive to assume there is zero risk though and that a sum of £3000 is purely for the inconvenience of you having to spend 2 weeks away from home. I reckon the risks would be suitably low to allow human testing in the first place and probably still a good way to make quick cash.
Russ is right in saying that the test is approved by the proper authorities, so whatever risk there might be is deemed acceptable.

Obviously it is up to each individual to decide if they do this or not. My feeling just is that you shouldn't put medication in your body when you're not ill, and like you say, it is naive to think there is no risk.

But then again, as a smoker, I put chemicals that are known to be harmful in my body on a daily basis...
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
danielf is offline   Reply With Quote